Head to head
v0 by Vercel vs Figma Make
Which is better, v0 by Vercel or Figma Make?
v0 by Vercel finishes ahead of Figma Make on the index, 87.3 to 79.5, and leads on all four scores: craft, speed, control and value. Both are scored on the same rubric, in the same week, and neither placing is sponsored.
Updated
v0 by Vercel
03 of 101
87.3
Generative interfaces for people who will read the code afterwards.
Figma Make
19 of 101
79.5
Prompt to working prototype, inside the tool design already uses.
The four scores, side by side
| Score | v0 by Vercel | Figma Make | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Craft | 91 | 84 | +7 |
| Speed | 88 | 84 | +4 |
| Control | 88 | 74 | +14 |
| Value | 80 | 74 | +6 |
| Index score | 87.3 | 79.5 | +7.8 |
Which to pick
v0 by Vercel is the safer pick on every axis we score. Figma Make earns its place in the index, but nothing in these four numbers argues for it over v0 by Vercel.
v0 by Vercel
v0 generates React and Next.js interfaces from a prompt or a screenshot, and hands you the source. It assumes a developer is in the loop, which is exactly why the output is easy to take somewhere else. As a way to skip the first eighty percent of a page, it is very hard to beat.
Where it shines
- The code is yours, readable, and ships straight into an existing codebase
- Screenshot-to-interface is genuinely accurate for layout and spacing
- Sits naturally next to the rest of the Vercel deployment workflow
Figma Make
Figma Make turns prompts and existing frames into working prototypes and applications without leaving Figma, which matters mainly because the design team is already there.
Where it shines
- No handoff, because it lives where the design already is
- Can build on existing frames rather than starting cold
- Backed by the tool most product teams standardise on