Skip to content

Head to head

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

Which is better, Cursor or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor finishes ahead of GitHub Copilot on the index, 81.8 to 77.0. It is the stronger of the two on Craft, Speed and Control, while GitHub Copilot still leads on Value. Both are scored on the same rubric, in the same week, and neither placing is sponsored.

Updated

Cursor

02 of 54

81.8

The editor most teams settled on, with an agent that ships whole features.

AI code editorFree tier

GitHub Copilot

16 of 54

77.0

The most polished inline completion, now with an agent mode worth using.

AI code editorFree tier

The four scores, side by side

ScoreCursorGitHub CopilotDifference
Craft8478+6
Speed8880+8
Control8072+8
Value7378+5
Index score81.877.0+4.8

Which to pick

Pick Cursor unless Value is what decides it for you, which is exactly where GitHub Copilot is the better answer.

Cursor

Cursor is the default answer for a reason: completion that feels a step ahead of you, model choice you actually control, and an agent that has grown from editing one file to carrying a feature across a repository. It is at its best as the place you work all day, with the genuinely hard problems handed to something more deliberate. The free tier exists but is a taste. Real use means a subscription, and heavy agent work meters on top of it.

Where it shines

  • Completion quality is still the benchmark others get measured against
  • Model choice stays yours rather than the vendor's
  • The agent handles multi-file work, not just the file you are sitting in

GitHub Copilot

Copilot's inline suggestion is still the most refined single-line completion anywhere, and agent mode has matured into something that competes on multi-file work rather than trailing it. Its real advantage is reach: it runs inside VS Code, Visual Studio and the JetBrains editors, so it meets a team where that team already is. It is the safe institutional choice, and it is rarely the sharpest tool on any individual axis.

Where it shines

  • The most polished inline completion in the market
  • Runs in VS Code, Visual Studio and JetBrains, so a team keeps its tools
  • A free tier that is genuinely usable rather than a demo